Send to

Choose Destination
Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Dec;38(12):1125-1132. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000754.

Value of the visual and semiquantitative analysis of carbon-11-methionine PET/CT in brain tumors' recurrence versus post-therapeutic changes.

Author information

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Molecular Imaging Group (IDIVAL), University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.


To compare the visual and semiquantitative analysis of carbon-11-methionine (C-MET) PET/computed tomography (CT) images in patients with primary brain tumors and suspected recurrence, persistence, or necrotic post-therapeutic changes. A total of 41 consecutive C-MET-PET/CT scans on 35 (21 men, mean age 44.1±16.6 years) patients were requested for MRI suspicion of recurrent or persistent primary tumor after therapy. The C-MET PET/CT were obtained 20 min after an intravenous injection of 555-740 MBq (15-20 mCi) of C-MET. Both visual and semiquantitative evaluations were performed comparing C-MET uptake between suspicious areas and different lesion/normal-to-background ratios. The final diagnosis was established by histological examination in 12 cases and clinical and MRI follow-up in 29 cases. Visual analyses were positive in 27 (63.4%) and negative in 14 (36.6%) of the C-MET PET/CT. The sensitivity was 83.9%, specificity was 90.0%, positive predictive value was 96.3%, negative predictive value was 64.3% and accuracy was 71.4%. For the semiquantitative analysis, all the lesion/normal-to-background ratios could differentiate between tumor and nontumor (P<0.001), the lesion/contralateral parenchyma (L/CP) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) being the index with the highest area under de curve (0.938). Applying an L/CP SUVmax index of 1.21, the sensitivity was 89.3%, specificity was 90.0%, positive predictive value was 96.1%, negative predictive value was 75%, and accuracy was 82.9%. C-MET-PET/CT was a useful technique to differentiate post-therapeutic changes from tumor presence in treated patients with brain neoplasm in whom cerebral MRI is nonconclusive, showing a high diagnostic performance. Our results showed only slight differences between visual analysis methods and the L/CP SUVmax ratio, the best of the semiquantitative methods.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center