Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):1167-1171. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.179.

Can National Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) Data Differentiate Hospitals in the United States?

Author information

1
1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,University of Maryland School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
2
3Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System Geriatrics Research,Education, and Clinical Center,Baltimore,Maryland.
3
4University of Maryland School of Dentistry,Baltimore,Maryland.
4
5Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering,University of Maryland Baltimore County,Baltimore,Maryland.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether patients using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare website (http://medicare.gov/hospitalcompare) can use nationally reported healthcare-associated infection (HAI) data to differentiate hospitals. DESIGN Secondary analysis of publicly available HAI data for calendar year 2013. METHODS We assessed the availability of HAI data for geographically proximate hospitals (ie, hospitals within the same referral region) and then analyzed these data to determine whether they are useful to differentiate hospitals. We assessed data for the 6 HAIs reported by hospitals to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). RESULTS Data were analyzed for 4,561 hospitals representing 88% of registered community and federal government hospitals in the United States. Healthcare-associated infection data are only useful for comparing hospitals if they are available for multiple hospitals within a geographic region. We found that data availability differed by HAI. Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) data were most available, with 82% of geographic regions (ie, hospital referral regions) having >50% of hospitals reporting them. In contrast, 4% of geographic regions had >50% of member hospitals reporting surgical site infections (SSI) for hysterectomies, which had the lowest availability. The ability of HAI data to differentiate hospitals differed by HAI: 72% of hospital referral regions had at least 1 pair of hospitals with statistically different risk-adjusted CDI rates (SIRs), compared to 9% for SSI (hysterectomy). CONCLUSIONS HAI data generally are reported by enough hospitals to meet minimal criteria for useful comparisons in many geographic locations, though this varies by type of HAI. CDI and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) are more likely to differentiate hospitals than the other publicly reported HAIs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1167-1171.

PMID:
28903802
PMCID:
PMC5905414
DOI:
10.1017/ice.2017.179
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center