Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nutrients. 2017 Sep 6;9(9). pii: E982. doi: 10.3390/nu9090982.

Dietary Protein Consumption and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Author information

1
Nutrition Department, Longgang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China. 18504541023@163.com.
2
National Discipline, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. 18504541023@163.com.
3
National Discipline, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. XUQIAN9188@163.com.
4
National Discipline, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. jruyue@163.com.
5
National Discipline, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. snowcalendar@126.com.
6
National Discipline, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. changhaosun2002@163.com.
7
National Discipline, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. nalixin2003@163.com.

Abstract

Recently, some studies have focused on the relationship between dietary protein intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but the conclusions have been inconsistent. Therefore, in this paper, a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies regarding protein consumption and T2DM risk are conducted in order to present the association between them. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for cohort studies on dietary protein, high-protein food consumption and risk of T2DM, up to July 2017. A summary of relative risks was compiled by the fixed-effect model or random-effect model. Eleven cohort studies regarded protein intake and T2DM (52,637 cases among 483,174 participants). The summary RR and 95% CI (Confidence Interval) of T2DM was 1.12 (1.08-1.17) in all subjects, 1.13 (1.04-1.24) in men, and 1.09 (1.04-1.15) in women for total protein;1.14 (1.09-1.19) in all subjects, 1.23 (1.09-1.38) in men, and 1.11 (1.03-1.19) in women for animal protein; 0.96 (0.88-1.06) in all subjects, 0.98 (0.72-1.34) in men, and 0.92 (0.86-0.98) in women for plant protein. We also compared the association between different food sources of protein and the risk of T2DM. The summary RR (Relative Risk) and 95% CI of T2DM was 1.22 (1.09-1.36) for red meat, 1.39 (1.29-1.49) for processed meat, 1.03 (0.89-1.17) for fish, 1.03 (0.64-1.67) for egg, 0.89 (0.84-0.94) for total dairy products, 0.87 (0.78-0.96) for whole milk, 0.83 (0.70-0.98) for yogurt, 0.74 (0.59-0.93) in women for soy. This meta-analysis shows that total protein and animal protein could increase the risk of T2DM in both males and females, and plant protein decreases the risk of T2DM in females. The association between high-protein food types and T2DM are also different. Red meat and processed meat are risk factors of T2DM, and soy, dairy and dairy products are the protective factors of T2DM. Egg and fish intake are not associated with a decreased risk of T2DM. This research indicates the type of dietary protein and food sources of protein that should be considered for the prevention of diabetes.

KEYWORDS:

diabetes; meta-analysis; protein; systematic review

PMID:
28878172
PMCID:
PMC5622742
DOI:
10.3390/nu9090982
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center