Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Aug 23;125(8):086004. doi: 10.1289/EHP1535.

Toward Consistent Methodology to Quantify Populations in Proximity to Oil and Gas Development: A National Spatial Analysis and Review.

Author information

1
PSE Healthy Energy , Ithaca, New York, USA.
2
Harvey Mudd College , Claremont, California, USA.
3
PSE Healthy Energy , Oakland, California, USA.
4
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley , Berkeley, California, USA.
5
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Higher risk of exposure to environmental health hazards near oil and gas wells has spurred interest in quantifying populations that live in proximity to oil and gas development. The available studies on this topic lack consistent methodology and ignore aspects of oil and gas development of value to public health-relevant assessment and decision-making.

OBJECTIVES:

We aim to present a methodological framework for oil and gas development proximity studies grounded in an understanding of hydrocarbon geology and development techniques.

METHODS:

We geospatially overlay locations of active oil and gas wells in the conterminous United States and Census data to estimate the population living in proximity to hydrocarbon development at the national and state levels. We compare our methods and findings with existing proximity studies.

RESULTS:

Nationally, we estimate that 17.6 million people live within 1,600m (∼1 mi) of at least one active oil and/or gas well. Three of the eight studies overestimate populations at risk from actively producing oil and gas wells by including wells without evidence of production or drilling completion and/or using inappropriate population allocation methods. The remaining five studies, by omitting conventional wells in regions dominated by historical conventional development, significantly underestimate populations at risk.

CONCLUSIONS:

The well inventory guidelines we present provide an improved methodology for hydrocarbon proximity studies by acknowledging the importance of both conventional and unconventional well counts as well as the relative exposure risks associated with different primary production categories (e.g., oil, wet gas, dry gas) and developmental stages of wells. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1535.

PMID:
28858829
PMCID:
PMC5783652
DOI:
10.1289/EHP1535
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center