Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Aug 23;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0372-4.

Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement without additional magnetization preparation.

Author information

1
Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. rob.holtackers@mumc.nl.
2
Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands. rob.holtackers@mumc.nl.
3
Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
4
Philips, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
5
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Escuela de Ingeniería, Santiago, Chile.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

This study evaluates a novel dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) method, without using additional magnetization preparation, and compares it to conventional bright-blood LGE, for the detection of ischaemic myocardial scar. LGE is able to clearly depict myocardial infarction and macroscopic scarring from viable myocardium. However, due to the bright signal of adjacent left ventricular blood, the apparent volume of scar tissue can be significantly reduced, or even completely obscured. In addition, blood pool signal can mimic scar tissue and lead to false positive observations. Simply nulling the blood magnetization by choosing shorter inversion times, leads to a negative viable myocardium signal that appears equally as bright as scar due to the magnitude image reconstruction. However, by combining blood magnetization nulling with the extended grayscale range of phase-sensitive inversion-recovery (PSIR), a darker blood signal can be achieved whilst a dark myocardium and bright scar signal is preserved.

METHODS:

LGE was performed in nine male patients (63 ± 11y) using a PSIR pulse sequence, with both conventional viable myocardium nulling and left ventricular blood nulling, in a randomized order. Regions of interest were drawn in the left ventricular blood, viable myocardium, and scar tissue, to assess contrast-to-noise ratios. Maximum scar transmurality, scar size, circumferential scar angle, and a confidence score for scar detection and maximum transmurality were also assessed. Bloch simulations were performed to simulate the magnetization levels of the left ventricular blood, viable myocardium, and scar tissue.

RESULTS:

Average scar-to-blood contrast was significantly (p < 0.001) increased by 99% when nulling left ventricular blood instead of viable myocardium, while scar-to-myocardium contrast was maintained. Nulling left ventricular blood also led to significantly (p = 0.038) higher expert confidence in scar detection and maximum transmurality. No significant changes were found in scar transmurality (p = 0.317), normalized scar size (p = 0.054), and circumferential scar angle (p = 0.117).

CONCLUSIONS:

Nulling left ventricular blood magnetization for PSIR LGE leads to improved scar-to-blood contrast and increased expert confidence in scar detection and scar transmurality. As no additional magnetization preparation is used, clinical application on current MR systems is readily available without the need for extensive optimizations, software modifications, and/or additional training.

KEYWORDS:

Dark blood; Delayed enhancement; Late enhancement; Late gadolinium enhancement; Myocardial infarction; Myocardial scar; Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery

PMID:
28835250
PMCID:
PMC5568308
DOI:
10.1186/s12968-017-0372-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center