Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jul 15;16:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.006. eCollection 2017.

Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Research Institute Brainclinics, Bijleveldsingel 34, 6524 AD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
2
Synaeda Psycho Medisch Centrum, Fonteinland 9, 8913 CZ, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
3
Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
4
Dept. of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
5
Dept. of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, The Netherlands.
6
Dept. of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) has frequently been reported as potential discriminator between depressed and healthy individuals, although contradicting results have been published. The aim of the current study was to provide an up to date meta-analysis on the diagnostic value of FAA in major depressive disorder (MDD) and to further investigate discrepancies in a large cross-sectional dataset.

METHODS:

SCOPUS database was searched through February 2017. Studies were included if the article reported on both MDD and controls, provided an FAA measure involving EEG electrodes F3/F4, and provided data regarding potential covariates. Hedges' d was calculated from FAA means and standard deviations (SDs). Potential covariates, such as age and gender, were explored. Post hoc analysis was performed to elucidate interindividual differences that could explain interstudy discrepancies.

RESULTS:

16 studies were included (MDD: n = 1883, controls: n = 2161). After resolving significant heterogeneity by excluding studies, a non-significant Grand Mean effect size (ES) was obtained (d = - 0.007;CI = [- 0.090]-[0.075]). Crosssectional analyses showed a significant three-way interaction for Gender × Age × Depression severity in the depressed group, which was prospectively replicated in an independent sample.

CONCLUSIONS:

The main result was a non-significant, negligible ES, demonstrating limited diagnostic value of FAA in MDD. The high degree of heterogeneity across studies indicates covariate influence, as was confirmed by crosssectional analyses, suggesting future studies should address this Gender × Age × Depression severity interaction. Upcoming studies should focus more on prognostic and research domain usages of FAA rather than a pure diagnostic tool.

KEYWORDS:

Depression; EEG; Electroencephalogram; Frontal alpha asymmetry; MDD; Meta-analysis

PMID:
28761811
PMCID:
PMC5524421
DOI:
10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.006
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center