Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Aug;103:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

No effect of hippocampal lesions on stimulus-response bindings.

Author information

1
MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: rik.henson@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
2
Department of Psychology, University of York, UK.
3
MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
4
Neuropsychology Department, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
5
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
6
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.

Abstract

The hippocampus is believed to be important for rapid learning of arbitrary stimulus-response contingencies, or S-R bindings. In support of this, Schnyer et al. (2006) (Experiment 2) measured priming of reaction times (RTs) to categorise visual objects, and found that patients with medial temporal lobe damage, unlike healthy controls, failed to show evidence of reduced priming when response contingencies were reversed between initial and repeated categorisation of objects (a signature of S-R bindings). We ran a similar though extended object classification task on 6 patients who appear to have selective hippocampal lesions, together with 24 age-matched controls. Unlike Schnyer et al. (2006), we found that reversing response contingencies abolished priming in both controls and patients. Bayes Factors provided no reason to believe that response reversal had less effect on patients than controls. We therefore conclude that it is unlikely that the hippocampus is needed for S-R bindings.

KEYWORDS:

Amnesia; Hippocampus; Response learning

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center