Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pancreatology. 2017 Sep - Oct;17(5):738-753. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Shimonoseki City Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan. Electronic address: masaotan@med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
2
Pancreas and Biliary Surgery Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
3
Department of Gastroenterology, Komagome Metropolitan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
4
Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
5
Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Service de Gastroentérologie-Pancréatologie, Hopital Beaujon, Clichy Cedex, France.
6
Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
7
Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
8
Dept. of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
9
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
10
Cameron Division of Surgical Oncology and The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Abstract

The management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) continues to evolve. In particular, the indications for resection of branch duct IPMN have changed from early resection to more deliberate observation as proposed by the international consensus guidelines of 2006 and 2012. Another guideline proposed by the American Gastroenterological Association in 2015 restricted indications for surgery more stringently and recommended physicians to stop surveillance if no significant change had occurred in a pancreatic cyst after five years of surveillance, or if a patient underwent resection and a non-malignant IPMN was found. Whether or not it is safe to do so, as well as the method and interval of surveillance, has generated substantial debate. Based on a consensus symposium held during the meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology in Sendai, Japan, in 2016, the working group has revised the guidelines regarding prediction of invasive carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia, surveillance, and postoperative follow-up of IPMN. As the working group did not recognize the need for major revisions of the guidelines, we made only minor revisions and added most recent articles where appropriate. The present guidelines include updated information and recommendations based on our current understanding, and highlight issues that remain controversial or where further research is required.

KEYWORDS:

International guidelines; Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; Pancreatic cancer; Surveillance

PMID:
28735806
DOI:
10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.007
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center