Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Psychol Methods. 2018 Mar;23(1):27-41. doi: 10.1037/met0000147. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Local fit evaluation of structural equation models using graphical criteria.

Author information

1
Department of Human Development, Psychology Department, Cornell University.
2
Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University.
3
Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences.

Abstract

Evaluation of model fit is critically important for every structural equation model (SEM), and sophisticated methods have been developed for this task. Among them are the χ² goodness-of-fit test, decomposition of the χ², derived measures like the popular root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) or comparative fit index (CFI), or inspection of residuals or modification indices. Many of these methods provide a global approach to model fit evaluation: A single index is computed that quantifies the fit of the entire SEM to the data. In contrast, graphical criteria like d-separation or trek-separation allow derivation of implications that can be used for local fit evaluation, an approach that is hardly ever applied. We provide an overview of local fit evaluation from the viewpoint of SEM practitioners. In the presence of model misfit, local fit evaluation can potentially help in pinpointing where the problem with the model lies. For models that do fit the data, local tests can identify the parts of the model that are corroborated by the data. Local tests can also be conducted before a model is fitted at all, and they can be used even for models that are globally underidentified. We discuss appropriate statistical local tests, and provide applied examples. We also present novel software in R that automates this type of local fit evaluation. (PsycINFO Database Record.

PMID:
28726444
DOI:
10.1037/met0000147
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for American Psychological Association
Loading ...
Support Center