Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4298-4.

Mobilising communities for Aedes aegypti control: the SEPA approach.

Author information

1
CIETinternational, New York, NY, USA. rledogar@ciet.org.
2
CIET in Nicaragua, Managua, Nicaragua.
3
Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Mexico.
4
International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Mexico City, Mexico.
5
Division of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
6
Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Abstract

Camino Verde (the Green Way) is an evidence-based community mobilisation tool for prevention of dengue and other mosquito-borne viral diseases. Its effectiveness was demonstrated in a cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted in 2010-2013 in Nicaragua and Mexico. The common approach that brought functional consistency to the Camino Verde intervention in both Mexico and Nicaragua is Socialisation of Evidence for Participatory Action (SEPA). In this article, we explain the SEPA concept and its theoretical origins, giving examples of its previous application in different countries and contexts. We describe how the approach was used in the Camino Verde intervention, with details that show commonalities and differences in the application of the approach in Mexico and Nicaragua. We discuss issues of cost, replicability and sustainability, and comment on which components of the intervention were most important to its success. In complex interventions, multiple components act in synergy to produce change. Among key factors in the success of Camino Verde were the use of community volunteers called brigadistas, the house-to-house visits they conducted, the use of evidence derived from the communities themselves, and community ownership of the undertaking. Communities received the intervention by random assignment; dengue was not necessarily their greatest concern. The very nature of the dengue threat dictated many of the actions that needed to be taken at household and neighbourhood levels to control it. But within these parameters, communities exercised a large degree of control over the intervention and displayed considerable ingenuity in the process.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ISRCTN27581154 .

KEYWORDS:

Aedes aegypti; Community; Community ownership; Complex interventions; Dengue; Sepa

PMID:
28699561
PMCID:
PMC5506583
DOI:
10.1186/s12889-017-4298-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center