Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e016041. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016041.

Ethnic differences in current smoking and former smoking in the Netherlands and the contribution of socioeconomic factors: a cross-sectional analysis of the HELIUS study.

Author information

1
Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
2
Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
3
Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
4
Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5
QIMR Berghofer, Translational Neurogenomics group, Brisbane, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Data exploring how much of the ethnic differences in smoking prevalence and former smoking are explained by socioeconomic status (SES) are lacking. We therefore assessed ethnic differences in smoking prevalence and former smoking and the contribution of both educational level and occupational-related SES to the observed ethnic differences in smoking behaviour.

METHODS:

Data of 22 929 participants (aged 18-70 years) from the multiethnic cross-sectional Healthy Life in an Urban Setting study in the Netherlands were analysed. Poisson regression models with a robust variance were used to estimate prevalence ratios.

RESULTS:

Compared with the Dutch, after adjustment for age and marital status, smoking prevalence was higher in men of Turkish (prevalence ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.86), African Surinamese (1.55, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.69) and South-Asian Surinamese origin (1.53, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.68), whereas among women, smoking prevalence was higher in Turkish, similar in African Surinamese but lower in all other ethnic origin groups. All ethnic minority groups, except Ghanaians, had a significantly lower smoking cessation prevalence than the Dutch. Socioeconomic gradients in smoking (higher prevalence among those lower educated and with lower level employment) were observed in all groups except Ghanaian women (a higher prevalence was observed in the higher educated). Ethnic differences in smoking prevalence and former smoking are largely, but not completely, explained by socioeconomic factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings imply that antismoking policies designed to target smoking within the lower socioeconomic groups of ethnic minority populations may substantially reduce ethnic inequalities in smoking particularly among men and that certain groups may benefit from targeted smoking cessation interventions.

KEYWORDS:

HELIUS study; ethnicity; prevalence; smoking cessation; socio-economic status (SES)

PMID:
28698339
PMCID:
PMC5541454
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016041
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center