Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 May 5;8(1):1314159. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1314159. eCollection 2017.

A scoping review of intimate partner violence assistance programmes within health care settings.

Author information

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Graduate Entry Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Canada.


Background: The lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) for women presenting to health care settings is estimated to be 38-59%. With the goal of providing help to victims of abuse, numerous IPV assistance programmes have been developed and evaluated across multiple health care settings. Objective: Our scoping review provides an overview of this literature to identify key areas for potential evidence-based recommendations and to focus research priorities. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and psycINFO. We used broad eligibility criteria to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of IPV assistance programmes delivered within health care settings. We completed all screening and data extraction independently and in duplicate. We used descriptive statistics to summarize all data. Results: Forty-three studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in our scoping review. Nine categories of assistance programmes were identified: counselling/advocacy, safety assessment/planning, referral, providing IPV resources, home visitation, case management, videos, provider cueing, and system changes. Characteristics of programmes amongst studies frequently reporting positive results included those in which one type of active assistance was used (77.8% of studies reported positive results), a counsellor, community worker, or case manager provided the intervention (83.3% of studies reported positive results), and programmes that were delivered over more than five sessions (100.0% of studies reported positive results). Conclusions: IPV assistance programmes are heterogeneous with regards to the types of assistance they include and how they are delivered and evaluated. This heterogeneity creates challenges in identifying which IPV assistance programmes, and which aspects of these programmes, are effective. However, it appears that many different types of IPV assistance programmes can have positive impacts on women.


Domestic violence; intimate partner abuse; spouse abuse; violence against women; woman abuse

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center