Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Acad Radiol. 2017 Nov;24(11):1428-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

Improving Abnormality Detection on Chest Radiography Using Game-Like Reinforcement Mechanics.

Author information

1
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Electronic address: po-hao.chen@uphs.upenn.edu.
2
Cooper University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Camden, New Jersey.
3
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
4
Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:

Despite their increasing prevalence, online textbooks, question banks, and digital references focus primarily on explicit knowledge. Implicit skills such as abnormality detection require repeated practice on clinical service and have few digital substitutes. Using mechanics traditionally deployed in video games such as clearly defined goals, rapid-fire levels, and narrow time constraints may be an effective way to teach implicit skills.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We created a freely available, online module to evaluate the ability of individuals to differentiate between normal and abnormal chest radiographs by implementing mechanics, including instantaneous feedback, rapid-fire cases, and 15-second timers. Volunteer subjects completed the modules and were separated based on formal experience with chest radiography. Performance between training and testing sets were measured for each group, and a survey was administered after each session.

RESULTS:

The module contained 74 cases and took approximately 20 minutes to complete. Thirty-two cases were normal radiographs and 56 cases were abnormal. Of the 60 volunteers recruited, 25 were "never trained" and 35 were "previously trained." "Never trained" users scored 21.9 out of 37 during training and 24.0 out of 37 during testing (59.1% vs 64.9%, P value <.001). "Previously trained" users scored 28.0 out of 37 during training and 28.3 out of 37 during testing phases (75.6% vs 76.4%, P value = .56). Survey results showed that 87% of all subjects agreed the module is an efficient way of learning, and 83% agreed the rapid-fire module is valuable for medical students.

CONCLUSIONS:

A gamified online module may improve the abnormality detection rates of novice interpreters of chest radiography, although experienced interpreters are less likely to derive similar benefits. Users reviewed the educational module favorably.

KEYWORDS:

Radiology education; chest radiography; gamification; perception; rapid-fire

PMID:
28647389
DOI:
10.1016/j.acra.2017.05.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center