Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 10;35(26):3002-3009. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.8428. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Versus Unstimulated Bone Marrow As a Graft Source for T-Cell-Replete Haploidentical Donor Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide.

Author information

1
Asad Bashey, Melhem Solh, The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA; Mei-Jie Zhang, Andrew St. Martin, Trevor Argall, Mehdi Hamadani, and Mary Eapen, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Shannon R. McCurdy and Ephraim Joseph Fuchs, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; Claudio Anasetti, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL; Stefan O. Ciurea, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Omotayo Fasan, The Center for Bone Marrow Transplantation at Geisinger Medical Center, Danville; Sameh Gaballa, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Pashna Munshi and Scott Rowley, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Monzr M. Al Malki and Ryotaro Nakamura, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Paul V. O'Donnell, Massachusetts General Hospital; Robert J. Soiffer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Miguel-Angel Perales, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kavita Raj, King's College Hospital, London; Vanderson Rocha, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; Rizwan Romee, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO; Scott Rowley, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; and Rachel B. Salit, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.

Abstract

Purpose T-cell-replete HLA-haploidentical donor hematopoietic transplantation using post-transplant cyclophosphamide was originally described using bone marrow (BM). With increasing use of mobilized peripheral blood (PB), we compared transplant outcomes after PB and BM transplants. Patients and Methods A total of 681 patients with hematologic malignancy who underwent transplantation in the United States between 2009 and 2014 received BM (n = 481) or PB (n = 190) grafts. Cox regression models were built to examine differences in transplant outcomes by graft type, adjusting for patient, disease, and transplant characteristics. Results Hematopoietic recovery was similar after transplantation of BM and PB (28-day neutrophil recovery, 88% v 93%, P = .07; 100-day platelet recovery, 88% v 85%, P = .33). Risks of grade 2 to 4 acute (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; P < .001) and chronic (HR, 0.35; P < .001) graft-versus-host disease were lower with transplantation of BM compared with PB. There were no significant differences in overall survival by graft type (HR, 0.99; P = .98), with rates of 54% and 57% at 2 years after transplantation of BM and PB, respectively. There were no differences in nonrelapse mortality risks (HR, 0.92; P = .74) but relapse risks were higher after transplantation of BM (HR, 1.49; P = .009). Additional exploration confirmed that the higher relapse risks after transplantation of BM were limited to patients with leukemia (HR, 1.73; P = .002) and not lymphoma (HR, 0.87; P = .64). Conclusion PB and BM grafts are suitable for haploidentical transplantation with the post-transplant cyclophosphamide approach but with differing patterns of treatment failure. Although, to our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive comparison, these findings must be validated in a randomized prospective comparison with adequate follow-up.

PMID:
28644773
PMCID:
PMC5590802
[Available on 2018-09-10]
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2017.72.8428
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center