Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1266-1271. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303822. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States.

Author information

1
Onur Altindag is with the Harvard T.ā€‰H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, and Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA. Ted Joyce is with Baruch College, City University of New York and National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To describe demographic characteristics and abortion timing of minors in Arkansas who obtained an abortion through a judicial bypass, and to contrast the frequency of judicial bypass in other states in the United States.

METHODS:

We used individual-level data on all abortions to minors (nā€‰=ā€‰2624) performed in Arkansas from 2005 to 2014 and aggregated data from 10 additional states on abortions obtained through a judicial bypass. We characterized correlates of the judicial bypass and its association with the timing of abortion.

RESULTS:

Minors in Arkansas who used the courts were more likely to be 17 years of age, nonresidents of Arkansas, Hispanic, and with fewer previous pregnancies than their younger, resident, non-Hispanic White, and multigravida counterparts; 7.7% of abortions to minors were obtained via a bypass in 11 states, but only 2% if Texas and Arkansas are excluded.

CONCLUSIONS:

The demographics of minors who obtain an abortion through a judicial bypass differ significantly from those who have parental consent, and there is widespread variation in the proportion of bypass cases across states.

PMID:
28640684
DOI:
10.2105/AJPH.2017.303822
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center