Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Pediatrics. 2017 Jun 20. pii: e20170319. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0319. [Epub ahead of print]

Clinicians' Perceptions of Screening for Food Insecurity in Suburban Pediatric Practice.

Author information

1
Department of Pediatrics, palakshappad@email.chop.edu.
2
Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness and PolicyLab, and.
3
Healthy Weight Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and.
4
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
5
Department of Pediatrics.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

National organizations recommend pediatricians screen for food insecurity (FI). Although there has been growing research in urban practices, little research has addressed FI screening in suburban practices. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of screening in suburban practices.

METHODS:

We conducted a mixed methods study that implemented FI screening in 6 suburban pediatric primary care practices. We included all children presenting for either a 2-, 15-, or 36-month well-child visit (N = 5645). Families who screened positive were eligible to be referred to our community partner that worked to connect families to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. We conducted focus groups with clinicians to determine their perceptions of screening and suggestions for improvement.

RESULTS:

Of the 5645 children eligible, 4371 (77.4%) were screened, of which 122 (2.8%) screened positive for FI (range: 0.9%-5.9% across practices). Of the 122 food-insecure families, only 1 received new Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. In focus groups, 3 themes emerged: (1) Time and workflow were not barriers to screening, but concerns about embarrassing families and being unable to provide adequate resources were; (2) Clinicians reported that parents felt the screening showed caring, which reinforced clinicians' continued screening; (3) Clinicians suggested implementing screening before the visit.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found it is feasible and acceptable for clinicians to screen for FI in suburban practices, but the referral method used in this study was ineffective in assisting families in obtaining benefits. Better approaches to connect families to local resources may be needed to maximize the effectiveness of screening in suburban settings.

PMID:
28634247
DOI:
10.1542/peds.2017-0319

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center