Format

Send to

Choose Destination
CJEM. 2018 May;20(3):463-470. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.28. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

The writer's guide to education scholarship in emergency medicine: Education innovations (part 3).

Author information

1
*Department of Emergency Medicine,Queen's University,Kingston,ON.
2
†Division of Emergency Medicine,Department of Medicine,McMaster University,Hamilton,ON.
3
‡Department of Emergency Medicine,University of Saskatchewan,Saskatoon,SK.
4
§Department of Emergency Medicine,University of Ottawa,Ottawa,ON.
5
¶Department of Pediatrics,McGill University,Montreal,QC.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The scholarly dissemination of innovative medical education practices helps broaden the reach of this type of work, allowing scholarship to have an impact beyond a single institution. There is little guidance in the literature for those seeking to publish program evaluation studies and innovation papers. This study aims to derive a set of evidence-based features of high-quality reports on innovations in emergency medicine (EM) education.

METHODS:

We conducted a scoping review and thematic analysis to determine quality markers for medical education innovation reports, with a focus on EM. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, and Google Scholar was augmented by a hand search of relevant publication guidelines, guidelines for authors, and website submission portals from medical education and EM journals. Study investigators reviewed the selected articles, and a thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS:

Our search strategy identified 14 relevant articles from which 34 quality markers were extracted. These markers were grouped into seven important themes: goals and need for innovation, preparation, innovation development, innovation implementation, evaluation of innovation, evidence of reflective practice, and reporting and dissemination. In addition, multiple outlets for the publication of EM education innovations were identified and compiled.

CONCLUSION:

The publication and dissemination of innovations are critical for the EM education community and the training of health professionals. We anticipate that our list of innovation report quality markers will be used by EM education innovators to support the dissemination of novel educational practices.

KEYWORDS:

innovation; medical education; publishing; writing

PMID:
28631581
DOI:
10.1017/cem.2017.28
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press
Loading ...
Support Center