Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Nov;157(5):837-847. doi: 10.1177/0194599817707167. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

Hearing Preservation: Does Electrode Choice Matter?

Author information

1
1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
2
2 Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
3
3 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Abstract

Objective Evaluate if electrode design affects hearing preservation (HP) following cochlear implantation (CI) with full-length electrodes. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral academic center. Subjects and Methods Forty-five adults with low-frequency hearing (≤85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz) who underwent unilateral CI with full-length electrode arrays made by 1 manufacturer were included. HP was calculated with (1) mean low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) at 250 and 500 Hz (MEAN method), (2) a percentile method across the audiometric frequency spectrum generating an S-value (HEARRING method), and (3) functional if hearing remained ≤85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz. Audiometric testing was performed approximately 1 month and 1 year postoperatively, yielding short-term and long-term results, respectively. Results Of 45 patients who underwent CI, 46.7% received lateral wall (LW) and 53.3% received perimodiolar (PM) electrodes. At short-term follow-up, LW electrodes were associated with significantly better HP than PM (LFPTA method: 27.7 vs 39.3 dB, P < .05; S-value method: 48.2 vs 21.8%, P < .05). In multivariate regression of short-term outcomes, LW electrode use was a significant predictor of better HP ( P < .05). At long-term follow-up, electrode type was not associated with HP. Younger patient age was the only significant predictor of long-term HP on multivariate analysis ( P < .05). Conclusion The LW electrode is associated with short-term HP, suggesting its design is favorable for limiting trauma to the cochlea during and directly following CI. Other factors, including age, are relevant for maintaining HP over the long term. The data support further investigation into what modifiable factors may promote long-term HP.

KEYWORDS:

atraumatic electrodes; cochlear implantation; electroacoustic stimulation; full-length electrodes; functional hearing; hearing aid; hearing preservation; low-frequency hearing; minimally traumatic surgery; multivariate analysis; residual hearing; soft surgery; speech recognition scores; univariate analysis

PMID:
28608735
DOI:
10.1177/0194599817707167
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center