Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neurobiol Dis. 2017 Sep;105:194-212. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 31.

Generating level-dependent models of cervical and thoracic spinal cord injury: Exploring the interplay of neuroanatomy, physiology, and function.

Author information

1
Division of Genetics and Development, Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, ON M5T 2S8, Canada; Institute of Medical Science and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
2
Division of Genetics and Development, Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.
3
STTARR Innovation Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada.
4
Division of Genetics and Development, Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, ON M5T 2S8, Canada; Institute of Medical Science and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada. Electronic address: Michael.Fehlings@uhn.ca.

Abstract

The majority of spinal cord injuries (SCI) occur at the cervical level, which results in significant impairment. Neurologic level and severity of injury are primary endpoints in clinical trials; however, how level-specific damages relate to behavioural performance in cervical injury is incompletely understood. We hypothesized that ascending level of injury leads to worsening forelimb performance, and correlates with loss of neural tissue and muscle-specific neuron pools. A direct comparison of multiple models was made with injury realized at the C5, C6, C7 and T7 vertebral levels using clip compression with sham-operated controls. Animals were assessed for 10weeks post-injury with numerous (40) outcome measures, including: classic behavioural tests, CatWalk, non-invasive MRI, electrophysiology, histologic lesion morphometry, neuron counts, and motor compartment quantification, and multivariate statistics on the total dataset. Histologic staining and T1-weighted MR imaging revealed similar structural changes and distinct tissue loss with cystic cavitation across all injuries. Forelimb tests, including grip strength, F-WARP motor scale, Inclined Plane, and forelimb ladder walk, exhibited stratification between all groups and marked impairment with C5 and C6 injuries. Classic hindlimb tests including BBB, hindlimb ladder walk, bladder recovery, and mortality were not different between cervical and thoracic injuries. CatWalk multivariate gait analysis showed reciprocal and progressive changes forelimb and hindlimb function with ascending level of injury. Electrophysiology revealed poor forelimb axonal conduction in cervical C5 and C6 groups alone. The cervical enlargement (C5-T2) showed progressive ventral horn atrophy and loss of specific motor neuron populations with ascending injury. Multivariate statistics revealed a robust dataset, rank-order contribution of outcomes, and allowed prediction of injury level with single-level discrimination using forelimb performance and neuron counts. Level-dependent models were generated using clip-compression SCI, with marked and reliable differences in forelimb performance and specific neuron pool loss.

KEYWORDS:

Cervical; Clip compression; Discriminant function analysis; Forelimb; Gait analysis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Motor neuron survival; Principal component analysis; Spinal Cord Injury; Thoracic

PMID:
28578003
DOI:
10.1016/j.nbd.2017.05.009
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center