Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6.

The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients.

Author information

1
Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, 3rd floor Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 3QD, UK. Talya.porat@kcl.ac.uk.
2
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Clinical decision support systems (DSS) aimed at supporting diagnosis are not widely used. This is mainly due to usability issues and lack of integration into clinical work and the electronic health record (EHR). In this study we examined the usability and acceptability of a diagnostic DSS prototype integrated with the EHR and in comparison with the EHR alone.

METHODS:

Thirty-four General Practitioners (GPs) consulted with 6 standardised patients (SPs) using only their EHR system (baseline session); on another day, they consulted with 6 different but matched for difficulty SPs, using the EHR with the integrated DSS prototype (DSS session). GPs were interviewed twice (at the end of each session), and completed the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire at the end of the DSS session. The SPs completed the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire after each consultation.

RESULTS:

The majority of GPs (74%) found the DSS useful: it helped them consider more diagnoses and ask more targeted questions. They considered three user interface features to be the most useful: (1) integration with the EHR; (2) suggested diagnoses to consider at the start of the consultation and; (3) the checklist of symptoms and signs in relation to each suggested diagnosis. There were also criticisms: half of the GPs felt that the DSS changed their consultation style, by requiring them to code symptoms and signs while interacting with the patient. SPs sometimes commented that GPs were looking at their computer more than at them; this comment was made more often in the DSS session (15%) than in the baseline session (3%). Nevertheless, SP ratings on the satisfaction questionnaire did not differ between the two sessions.

CONCLUSIONS:

To use the DSS effectively, GPs would need to adapt their consultation style, so that they code more information during rather than at the end of the consultation. This presents a potential barrier to adoption. Training GPs to use the system in a patient-centred way, as well as improvement of the DSS interface itself, could facilitate coding. To enhance patient acceptability, patients should be informed about the potential of the DSS to improve diagnostic accuracy.

KEYWORDS:

Acceptability; Cognitive engineering; Decision support systems; Diagnosis; Diagnostic error; Electronic health record; Patient satisfaction; Usability; Usefulness

PMID:
28576145
PMCID:
PMC5457602
DOI:
10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center