Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Animal. 2017 Oct;11(10):1839-1851. doi: 10.1017/S175173111700115X. Epub 2017 May 31.

Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability.

Author information

1
1Wageningen Economic Research,PO-box 29703, 2502LS Den Haag,The Netherlands.
2
2Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre,Wageningen Livestock Research,PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen,The Netherlands.
3
3Business Economics Group,Wageningen University,PO-box 8130, 6700EW Wageningen,The Netherlands.
4
4Department of Animal Nutrition,Wageningen Livestock Research,PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen,The Netherlands.
5
5Animal Production Systems group,Wageningen University,PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen,The Netherlands.
6
6Behavioural Ecology Group,Wageningen University,PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen,The Netherlands.

Abstract

To sustainably contribute to food security of a growing and richer world population, livestock production systems are challenged to increase production levels while reducing environmental impact, being economically viable, and socially responsible. Knowledge about the sustainability performance of current livestock production systems may help to formulate strategies for future systems. Our study provides a systematic overview of differences between conventional and organic livestock production systems on a broad range of sustainability aspects and animal species available in peer-reviewed literature. Systems were compared on economy, productivity, environmental impact, animal welfare and public health. The review was limited to dairy cattle, beef cattle, pigs, broilers and laying hens, and to Europe, North America and New Zealand. Results per indicators are presented as in the articles without performing additional calculations. Out of 4171 initial search hits, 179 articles were analysed. Studies varied widely in indicators, research design, sample size and location and context. Quite some studies used small samples. No study analysed all aspects of sustainability simultaneously. Conventional systems had lower labour requirements per unit product, lower income risk per animal, higher production per animal per time unit, higher reproduction numbers, lower feed conversion ratio, lower land use, generally lower acidification and eutrophication potential per unit product, equal or better udder health for cows and equal or lower microbiological contamination. Organic systems had higher income per animal or full time employee, lower impact on biodiversity, lower eutrophication and acidification potential per unit land, equal or lower likelihood of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and higher beneficial fatty acid levels in cow milk. For most sustainability aspects, sometimes conventional and sometimes organic systems performed better, except for productivity, which was consistently higher in conventional systems. For many aspects and animal species, more data are needed to conclude on a difference between organic and conventional livestock production systems.

KEYWORDS:

conventional; literature review; livestock production system; organic; sustainability

PMID:
28558861
PMCID:
PMC5607874
DOI:
10.1017/S175173111700115X
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center