Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):340.e1-340.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 May 23.

Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014.

Author information

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: l-matthews@northwestern.edu.
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Interest in medical malpractice and areas of medicolegal vulnerability for practicing obstetricians and gynecologists has grown substantially, and many providers report changing surgical practice out of fear of litigation. Furthermore, education on medical malpractice and risk management is lacking for obstetrics and gynecology trainees. Recent obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims data are lacking. We report on recent trends in malpractice claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures, and compare these trends to those of other medical specialties.

OBJECTIVE:

We sought to evaluate recent trends in malpractice claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures and compare these to other medical specialties.

STUDY DESIGN:

A search was performed on all medicolegal claims data for obstetrics and gynecology procedures from Jan. 1, 2005, through Dec. 31, 2014, using the Physician Insurers' Association of America data-sharing project, which was created to identify medical professional liability trends. Data from 20 insurance carriers were reviewed based on a search using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and unique database-specific codes.

RESULTS:

Of the 10,915 total claims closed from 2005 through 2014, the majority (59.5%) were dropped, withdrawn, or dismissed. The average indemnity of the remaining paid claims (31.1%) was $423,250. The most frequently litigated procedure was operative procedures on the uterus; 27.8% of cases were paid with an average indemnity of $279,384. The procedure associated with the highest proportion of paid claims was vacuum extraction. The average indemnity for paid obstetrics and gynecology procedural claims was 27% higher than that for all medical specialties combined. Obstetrics and gynecology procedural claims had the second highest average indemnity payment and the fifth highest paid-to-closed ratio of all medical specialties.

CONCLUSION:

Litigation claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures have higher average indemnity payments and higher paid-to-closed ratios than most other medical specialties. Claims most frequently relate to gynecologic surgery, but obstetric procedures are more expensive. Possible factors may include procedural experience and unique perioperative complications. We encourage efforts addressing procedures, litigation, and quality interventions to improve outcomes, mitigate risk, and potentially lower indemnity payments.

KEYWORDS:

gynecologic surgery; litigation; medical education

PMID:
28549980
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.037
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center