Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jul;26(3):491-494. doi: 10.1017/S096318011600116X.

When Teachable Moments Become Ethically Problematic.

Abstract

There is frequently tension in medical education between teaching moments that provide skills and knowledge for medical trainees, and instrumentalizing patients for the purpose of teaching. In this commentary, I question the ethical acceptability of the practice of providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) to dying patients who would be unlikely to survive resuscitation, as a teaching opportunity for medical trainees. This practice violates the principle of informed consent, as the patient agreed to resuscitation for the purpose of potentially prolonging life rather than to futile resuscitation as a teaching opportunity. Justifying futile resuscitation in order to practice normalizes deceptive and nonconsensual teaching cases in medical training. Condoning these behaviors as ethically acceptable trains physicians to believe that core ethical principles are relative and fluid to suit one's purpose. I argue that these practices are antithetical to the principles espoused by both medical ethics and physician professionalism.

KEYWORDS:

end-of-life care; futility; hidden curriculum; informed consent; medical education; resuscitation

PMID:
28541177
DOI:
10.1017/S096318011600116X
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Cambridge University Press
    Loading ...
    Support Center