Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Proteomics. 2017 May 17;14:19. doi: 10.1186/s12014-017-9154-0. eCollection 2017.

The serum protein responses to treatment with Xiaoke Pill and Glibenclamide in type 2 diabetes patients.

Author information

1
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Centre, No. 11, Xi Zhi Men Nan Da Jie, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044 China.
2
CAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101 China.
3
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005 China.
4
Clinical Trials and Biostatistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
5
Proteomics Division, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China.
#
Contributed equally

Abstract

AIM:

The Xiaoke Pill containing Chinese herb extracts and Glibenclamide, is used in therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and is effective in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia and improving diabetes symptoms compared with Glibenclamide. We describe a quantitative proteomics project to measure the T2DM serum proteome response to the Xiaoke Pill and Glibenclamide.

METHODS:

Based on a recently conducted 48-week clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Glibenclamide (n = 400) and Xiaoke Pill (n = 400), after matching for age, sex, BMI, drug dose and whether hypoglycemia occurred, 32 patients were selected for the serum based proteomic analysis and divided into four groups (with/without hypoglycemia treated with Xiaoke Pill or Glibenclamide, n = 8 for each group). We screened the differential serum proteins related to treatments and the onset of hypoglycemia using the iTRAQ labeling quantitative proteomics technique. Baseline and follow-up samples were used.

RESULTS:

The quantitative proteomics experiments demonstrated that 25 and 21 proteins differed upon treatment with the Xiaoke Pill in patients without and with hypoglycemia, respectively, while 24 and 25 proteins differed upon treatment with Glibenclamide in patients without and with hypoglycemia, respectively. The overlap of different proteins between the patients with and without hypoglycemia given the same drug treatment was much greater than between the patients given different drug treatments.

CONCLUSIONS:

We conclude that the serum proteins response to the two different anti-diabetic drug treatments may serve as a sensitive biomarker for evaluation of the therapeutic effects and continue investigations into the mechanism.

KEYWORDS:

Chinese herb; Glibenclamide; Hypoglycemia; Proteomics; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center