Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Oct;36(10):967-972. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001638.

Treatment Outcomes of Third-line Antiretroviral Regimens in HIV-infected Thai Adolescents.

Author information

1
From the *The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration (HIV-NAT), The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand; †Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; ‡Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Nonthaburi, Thailand; §Nakornping Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand; ¶Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand; ‖Prapokklao Hospital, Chantaburi, Thailand; **Surin Hospital, Surin, Thailand; ††Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai, Thailand; ‡‡The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; §§Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ¶¶Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; and ‖‖The University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Efficacy and safety data of third-line antiretroviral (ARV) regimens in adolescents are limited.

METHODOLOGY:

This study enrolled HIV-infected Thais who were treated with third-line regimens consisting of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), etravirine (ETR), tipranavir/ritonavir or raltegravir.

RESULTS:

Fifty-four adolescents 2-17 years of age were enrolled from 8 sites and followed for 48 weeks. Reasons for switch were second-line failure (n = 44) and toxicity to second-line regimens (n = 10). At switching to third-line ARV, the median age (interquartile range) was 14.3 (12.4-15.4) years. Genotypes at time of second-line failure (n = 44) were M184V (77%), ≥4 thymidine analogue mutations (25%), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant associated mutation (RAM) (80%), ETR-RAM score ≥4 (14%), any lopinavir-RAM (59%) and ≥1 major DRV-RAM (41%). The third-line regimens had a median of 4 (min-max, 4-6) drugs and included ETR/DRV/r (43%), DRV/r (33%), ETR (17%), tipranavir/ritonavir (2%) or raltegravir/DRV/r/ (4%). The median CD4 (interquartile range) increased from 16% (12-21) at third-line switch to 21% (18-25) and 410 (172-682) to 607 (428-742) cells/mm at 48 weeks (P < 0.001). HIV RNA declined from 3.9 (2.9-4.9) to 1.6 (1.6-3.0) log10 copies/mL (P < 0.001) and 33/50 (66%) had levels <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks. Seventeen (31%) had HIV-RNA ≥1000 copies/mL; about half due to poor adherence; genotyping in 13 of these adolescents revealed ETR-RAM score ≥4 in 2 (15%) and ≥1 major DRV-RAM in 7 (54%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Third-line ARV therapy was well tolerated and resulted in virologic suppression in 70% of adolescents at 1 year. Poor adherence and limited ARV options are major problems in the long-term management of adolescents with HIV.

PMID:
28520611
DOI:
10.1097/INF.0000000000001638
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center