Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 15;19(5):e162. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6887.

Enhancing Comparative Effectiveness Research With Automated Pediatric Pneumonia Detection in a Multi-Institutional Clinical Repository: A PHIS+ Pilot Study.

Author information

1
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
2
Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
3
Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
4
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
5
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
6
Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading cause of pediatric morbidity. Administrative data are often used to conduct comparative effectiveness research (CER) with sufficient sample sizes to enhance detection of important outcomes. However, such studies are prone to misclassification errors because of the variable accuracy of discharge diagnosis codes.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to develop an automated, scalable, and accurate method to determine the presence or absence of pneumonia in children using chest imaging reports.

METHODS:

The multi-institutional PHIS+ clinical repository was developed to support pediatric CER by expanding an administrative database of children's hospitals with detailed clinical data. To develop a scalable approach to find patients with bacterial pneumonia more accurately, we developed a Natural Language Processing (NLP) application to extract relevant information from chest diagnostic imaging reports. Domain experts established a reference standard by manually annotating 282 reports to train and then test the NLP application. Findings of pleural effusion, pulmonary infiltrate, and pneumonia were automatically extracted from the reports and then used to automatically classify whether a report was consistent with bacterial pneumonia.

RESULTS:

Compared with the annotated diagnostic imaging reports reference standard, the most accurate implementation of machine learning algorithms in our NLP application allowed extracting relevant findings with a sensitivity of .939 and a positive predictive value of .925. It allowed classifying reports with a sensitivity of .71, a positive predictive value of .86, and a specificity of .962. When compared with each of the domain experts manually annotating these reports, the NLP application allowed for significantly higher sensitivity (.71 vs .527) and similar positive predictive value and specificity .

CONCLUSIONS:

NLP-based pneumonia information extraction of pediatric diagnostic imaging reports performed better than domain experts in this pilot study. NLP is an efficient method to extract information from a large collection of imaging reports to facilitate CER.

KEYWORDS:

comparative effectiveness research; medical informatics; natural language processing; pneumonia, bacterial

PMID:
28506958
DOI:
10.2196/jmir.6887
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for JMIR Publications
    Loading ...
    Support Center