Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 15;17(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2290-4.

Funding and remuneration of interdisciplinary primary care teams in Canada: a conceptual framework and application.

Author information

1
School of Public Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. dwl@dal.ca.
2
Faculty of Management, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
3
Department of Community Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
4
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
5
Provider Compensation and Strategic Partnership Branch, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Canada.
6
Primary Health Care and Chronic Disease, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Winnipeg, Canada.
7
Primary Care, Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness, Halifax, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Reliance on interdisciplinary teams in the delivery of primary care is on the rise. Funding bodies strive to design financial environments that support collaboration between providers. At present, the design of financial arrangements has been fragmented and not based on evidence. The root of the problem is a lack of systematic evidence demonstrating the superiority of any particular financial arrangement, or a solid understanding of options. In this study we develop a framework for the conceptualization and analysis of financial arrangements in interdisciplinary primary care teams.

METHODS:

We use qualitative data from three sources: (i) interviews with 19 primary care decision makers representing 215 clinics in three Canadian provinces, (ii) a research roundtable with 14 primary care decision makers and/or researchers, and (iii) policy documents. Transcripts from interviews and the roundtable were coded thematically and a framework synthesis approach was applied.

RESULTS:

Our conceptual framework differentiates between team level funding and provider level remuneration, and characterizes the interplay and consonance between them. Particularly the notions of hierarchy, segregation, and dependence of provider incomes, and the link between funding and team activities are introduced as new clarifying concepts, and their implications explored. The framework is applied to the analysis of collaboration incentives, which appear strongest when provider incomes are interdependent, funding is linked to the team as a whole, and accountability does not have multiple lines. Emergent implementation issues discussed by respondents include: (i) centrality of budget negotiations; (ii) approaches to patient rostering; (iii) unclear funding sources for space and equipment; and (iv) challenges with community engagement. The creation of patient rosters is perceived as a surprisingly contentious issue, and the challenges of funding for space and equipment remain unresolved.

CONCLUSIONS:

The development and application of a conceptual framework is an important step to the systematic study of the best performing financial models in the context of interdisciplinary primary care. The identification of optimal financial arrangements must be contextualized in terms of feasibility and the implementation environment. In general, financial hierarchy, both overt and covert, is considered a barrier to collaboration.

PMID:
28506224
PMCID:
PMC5433058
DOI:
10.1186/s12913-017-2290-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center