Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Implement Sci. 2017 May 11;12(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0588-6.

The association between implementation strategy use and the uptake of hepatitis C treatment in a national sample.

Author information

1
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA. rogalss@upmc.edu.
2
Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. rogalss@upmc.edu.
3
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. rogalss@upmc.edu.
4
Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Norse Rogers Memorial VA Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA.
5
Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.
6
VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
7
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
8
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, HSR&D and Mental Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR, USA.
9
Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
10
Gastroenterology Section, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA.
11
New England Veterans Engineering Resource Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
12
HIV, Hepatitis and Related Conditions Programs, Office of Specialty Care Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
13
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
14
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common and highly morbid illness. New medications that have much higher cure rates have become the new evidence-based practice in the field. Understanding the implementation of these new medications nationally provides an opportunity to advance the understanding of the role of implementation strategies in clinical outcomes on a large scale. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study defined discrete implementation strategies and clustered these strategies into groups. The present evaluation assessed the use of these strategies and clusters in the context of HCV treatment across the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Veterans Health Administration, the largest provider of HCV care nationally.

METHODS:

A 73-item survey was developed and sent to all VA sites treating HCV via electronic survey, to assess whether or not a site used each ERIC-defined implementation strategy related to employing the new HCV medication in 2014. VA national data regarding the number of Veterans starting on the new HCV medications at each site were collected. The associations between treatment starts and number and type of implementation strategies were assessed.

RESULTS:

A total of 80 (62%) sites responded. Respondents endorsed an average of 25 ± 14 strategies. The number of treatment starts was positively correlated with the total number of strategies endorsed (r = 0.43, p < 0.001). Quartile of treatment starts was significantly associated with the number of strategies endorsed (p < 0.01), with the top quartile endorsing a median of 33 strategies, compared to 15 strategies in the lowest quartile. There were significant differences in the types of strategies endorsed by sites in the highest and lowest quartiles of treatment starts. Four of the 10 top strategies for sites in the top quartile had significant correlations with treatment starts compared to only 1 of the 10 top strategies in the bottom quartile sites. Overall, only 3 of the top 15 most frequently used strategies were associated with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results suggest that sites that used a greater number of implementation strategies were able to deliver more evidence-based treatment in HCV. The current assessment also demonstrates the feasibility of electronic self-reporting to evaluate ERIC strategies on a large scale. These results provide initial evidence for the clinical relevance of the ERIC strategies in a real-world implementation setting on a large scale. This is an initial step in identifying which strategies are associated with the uptake of evidence-based practices in nationwide healthcare systems.

KEYWORDS:

Feasibility; Importance; Interferon-free medications

PMID:
28494811
PMCID:
PMC5425997
DOI:
10.1186/s13012-017-0588-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center