Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Endocr Pathol. 2017 Sep;28(3):247-252. doi: 10.1007/s12022-017-9486-3.

Differences in Clinical Features Between Subcategories of "Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance".

Author information

1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, South Korea.
2
Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
3
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, South Korea. ahnsh30@snu.ac.kr.

Abstract

Within the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), category III (atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS)) comprises specimens with heterogeneous features and the need for subcategorization has been reported. We compared the clinical features of two subgroups from within the category of AUS/FLUS to determine precise guidelines for clinicians who explain the results of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to patients. Retrospective review was performed including data from all patients who underwent FNA with results reported as AUS/FLUS at a single tertiary hospital from January 2010 to August 2014. The results of repeated FNA, core needle biopsy, and diagnostic surgery were analyzed. Of the 903 patients with results categorized as AUS/FLUS, 500 were subcategorized as cellular atypia and 160 as architectural atypia. On repeated biopsy, diagnostic results were obtained for 78.9% patients of the cellular atypia group, compared to only 54.3% of the architectural atypia group (p < 0.0001). The rate of neoplasm or malignancy was also significantly higher in the cellular atypia group compared to the architectural atypia group (51.8 vs. 25.2%, p < 0.0001, 48.2 vs. 14.2%, p < 0.0001). Therefore, clinicians can inform patients with architectural atypia that the risk of malignancy is low. However, the high rate of non-diagnostic results on repeated biopsy makes clinical decisions difficult. The data of the present study revealed the necessity of subcategorization of category III of TBSRTC in the future.

KEYWORDS:

Atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance; Fine-needle aspiration; Subclassification; Thyroid

PMID:
28488195
DOI:
10.1007/s12022-017-9486-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center