Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Health Serv Insights. 2017 Apr 20;10:1178632917701025. doi: 10.1177/1178632917701025. eCollection 2017.

Outcomes of Surgeries Performed in Physician Offices Compared With Ambulatory Surgery Centers and Hospital Outpatient Departments in Florida.

Author information

1
School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
2
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
3
Avalon Health Economics LLC, Morristown, NJ, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The proportion of outpatient surgeries performed in physician offices has been increasing over time, raising concern about the impact on outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:

To use a private insurance claims database to compare 7-day and 30-day hospitalization rates following relatively complex outpatient surgical procedures across physician offices, freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), and hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs).

METHODS:

A multivariable logistic regression model was used to compare the risk-adjusted probability of hospitalization among patients after any of the 88 study outpatient procedures at physician offices, ASCs, and HOPDs over 2008-2012 in Florida.

RESULTS:

Risk-adjusted hospitalization rates were higher following procedures performed in physician offices compared with ASCs for all procedures grouped together, for most procedures grouped by type, and for many individual procedures.

CONCLUSIONS:

Hospitalizations following surgery were more likely for procedures performed in physician offices compared with ASCs, which highlights the need for ongoing research on the safety and efficacy of office-based surgery.

KEYWORDS:

Ambulatory surgery; hospitalization rates; office-based surgery; outcomes; quality of care; surgical quality

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Disclosures and Ethics As a requirement of publication, author(s) have provided to the publisher signed confirmation of compliance with legal and ethical obligations including, but not limited to the, following: authorship and contributorship, conflicts of interest, privacy and confidentiality, and (where applicable) protection of human and animal research subjects. The authors have read and confirmed their agreement with the ICMJE authorship and conflict of interest criteria. The authors have also confirmed that this article is unique and not under consideration or published in any other publication, and that they have permission from rights holders to reproduce any copyrighted material. Any disclosures are made in this section. The external blind peer reviewers report no conflicts of interest.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center