Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Cancer. 2017 May 2;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3297-2.

The E2F4 prognostic signature predicts pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Author information

1
Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
2
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
3
Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. chao.cheng@dartmouth.edu.
4
Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA. chao.cheng@dartmouth.edu.
5
Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA. chao.cheng@dartmouth.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a key component of breast cancer treatment regimens and pathologic complete response to this therapy varies among patients. This is presumably due to differences in the molecular mechanisms that underlie each tumor's disease pathology. Developing genomic clinical assays that accurately categorize responders from non-responders can provide patients with the most effective therapy for their individual disease.

METHODS:

We applied our previously developed E2F4 genomic signature to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer. E2F4 individual regulatory activity scores were calculated for 1129 patient samples across 5 independent breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy datasets. Accuracy of the E2F4 signature in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response was compared to that of the Oncotype DX and MammaPrint predictive signatures.

RESULTS:

In all datasets, E2F4 activity level was an accurate predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, with high E2F4 scores predictive of achieving pathologic complete response and low scores predictive of residual disease. These results remained significant even after stratifying patients by estrogen receptor (ER) status, tumor stage, and breast cancer molecular subtypes. Compared to the Oncotype DX and MammaPrint signatures, our E2F4 signature achieved similar performance in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, though all signatures performed better in ER+ tumors compared to ER- ones. The accuracy of our signature was reproducible across datasets and was maintained when refined from a 199-gene signature down to a clinic-friendly 33-gene panel.

CONCLUSION:

Overall, we show that our E2F4 signature is accurate in predicting patient response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As this signature is more refined and comparable in performance to other clinically available gene expression assays in the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, it should be considered when evaluating potential treatment options.

KEYWORDS:

Breast cancer; ChIP-seq; E2F4; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathologic complete response; Transcription factor

PMID:
28464832
PMCID:
PMC5414335
DOI:
10.1186/s12885-017-3297-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center