Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4254-3.

Knowledge-exchange in the Pacific: outcomes of the TROPIC (translational research for obesity prevention in communities) project.

Author information

1
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, 3216, Australia. peter.kremer@deakin.edu.au.
2
WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Geelong, 3216, Australia.
3
College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
4
Deakin Health Economics, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, 3216, Australia.
5
Institute for Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, 3000, Australia.
6
School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The Pacific TROPIC (Translational Research for Obesity Prevention in Communities) project aimed to design, implement and evaluate a knowledge-broking approach to evidence-informed policy making to address obesity in Fiji. This paper reports on the quantitative evaluation of the knowledge-broking intervention through assessment of participants' perceptions of evidence use and development of policy/advocacy briefs.

METHODS:

Selected staff from six organizations - four government Ministries and two nongovernment organizations (NGOs) - participated in the project. The intervention comprised workshops and supported development of policy/advocacy briefs. Workshops addressed obesity and policy cycles and developing participants' skills in accessing, assessing, adapting and applying relevant evidence. A knowledge-broking team supported participants individually and/or in small groups to develop evidence-informed policy/advocacy briefs. A questionnaire survey that included workplace and demographic items and the self-assessment tool "Is Research Working for You?" (IRWFY) was administered pre- and post-intervention.

RESULTS:

Forty nine individuals (55% female, 69% 21-40 years, 69% middle-senior managers) participated in the study. The duration and level of participant engagement with the intervention activities varied - just over half participated for 10+ months, just under half attended most workshops and approximately one third produced one or more policy briefs. There were few reliable changes on the IRWFY scales following the intervention; while positive changes were found on several scales, these effects were small (d < .2) and only one individual scale (assess) was statistically significant (p < .05). Follow up (N = 1) analyses of individual-level change indicated that while 63% of participants reported increased research utilization post-intervention, this proportion was not different to chance levels. Similar analysis using scores aggregated by organization also revealed no organizational-level change post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study empirically evaluated a knowledge-broking program that aimed to extend evidence-informed policy making skills and development of a suite of national policy briefs designed to increase the enactment of obesity-related policies. The findings failed to indicate reliable improvements in research utilization at either the individual or organizational level. Factors associated with fidelity and intervention dose as well as challenges related to organizational support and the measurement of research utilization, are discussed and recommendations for future research presented.

KEYWORDS:

Evidence-informed policy making; Fiji; Knowledge-broking; Obesity

PMID:
28446165
PMCID:
PMC5405494
DOI:
10.1186/s12889-017-4254-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center