Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 26;284(1853). pii: 20162243. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2243.

Individual variation in local interaction rules can explain emergent patterns of spatial organization in wild baboons.

Author information

1
Department of Anthropology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, USA damien.farine@orn.mpg.de.
2
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, Panama.
3
Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK.
4
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, 106A Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ, USA arianasp@gmail.com.
5
Department of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
6
Chair of Biodiversity and Collective Behaviour, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
7
Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 South Morgan Street, Chicago, IL, USA.
8
Department of Anthropology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, USA mccrofoot@ucdavis.edu.
9
Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, USA.

Abstract

Researchers have long noted that individuals occupy consistent spatial positions within animal groups. However, an individual's position depends not only on its own behaviour, but also on the behaviour of others. Theoretical models of collective motion suggest that global patterns of spatial assortment can arise from individual variation in local interaction rules. However, this prediction remains untested. Using high-resolution GPS tracking of members of a wild baboon troop, we identify consistent inter-individual differences in within-group spatial positioning. We then apply an algorithm that identifies what number of conspecific group members best predicts the future location of each individual (we call this the individual's neighbourhood size) while the troop is moving. We find clear variation in the most predictive neighbourhood size, and this variation relates to individuals' propensity to be found near the centre of their group. Using simulations, we show that having different neighbourhood sizes is a simple candidate mechanism capable of linking variation in local individual interaction rules-in this case how many conspecifics an individual interacts with-to global patterns of spatial organization, consistent with the patterns we observe in wild primates and a range of other organisms.

KEYWORDS:

Papio; collective animal behaviour; foraging; group-living; social structure; within-group spatial position

PMID:
28424342
PMCID:
PMC5413915
DOI:
10.1098/rspb.2016.2243
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center