Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan;50(1):265-274. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.477. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance of Patients with Prostate Cancer in Korea: A Multicenter Analysis of Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy.

Author information

1
Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
2
Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
3
Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
4
Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
5
Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
6
Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
7
Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
8
Department of Urology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
9
Department of Urology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Korean patients with prostate cancer (PC) typically present with a more aggressive disease than patients in Western populations. Consequently, it is unclear if the current criteria for active surveillance (AS) can safely be applied to Korean patients. Therefore, this study was conducted to define appropriate selection criteria for AS for patients with PC in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 2,126 patients with low risk PC who actually underwent radical prostatectomy. The primary outcome was an unfavorable disease, which was defined by non-organ confined disease or an upgrading of the Gleason score to ≥ 7 (4+3). Predictive variables of an unfavorable outcome were identified by multivariate analysis using randomly selected training samples (n=1,623, 76.3%). We compared our selected criteria to various Western criteria for the primary outcome and validated our criteria using the remaining validation sample (n=503, 23.7%).

RESULTS:

A non-organ confined disease rate of 14.9% was identified, with an increase in Gleason score ≥ 7 (4+3) of 8.7% and a final unfavorable disease status of 20.8%. The following criteria were selected: Gleason score ≤ 6, clinical stage T1-T2a, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 ng/mL, PSA density < 0.15 ng/mL/mL, number of positive cores ≤ 2, and maximum cancer involvement in any one core ≤ 20%. These criteria provided the lowest unfavorable disease rate (11.7%) when compared to Western criteria (13.3%-20.7%), and their validity was confirmed using the validation sample (5.9%).

CONCLUSION:

We developed AS criteria which are appropriate for Korean patients with PC. Prospective studies using these criteria are now warranted.

KEYWORDS:

Observation; Pathology; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms

PMID:
28421726
PMCID:
PMC5784641
DOI:
10.4143/crt.2016.477
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Publishing M2Community Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center