Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Respir J. 2017 Apr 12;49(4). pii: 1601296. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01296-2016. Print 2017 Apr.

Randomised comparison of needle aspiration and chest tube drainage in spontaneous pneumothorax.

Author information

1
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway andreas.thelle@helse-bergen.no.
2
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
3
Norwegian Registry for Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation, Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
4
Norwegian Registry for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
5
Department of Thoracic Medicine, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
6
Department of Circulation and Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
7
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
8
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Norway.

Abstract

Guidelines on spontaneous pneumothorax are contradictory as to intervention between needle aspiration (NA) and chest tube drainage (CTD). Studies show poor adherence to guidelines.Three Norwegian hospitals included patients with primary (PSP) and secondary (SSP) spontaneous pneumothorax. Patients underwent NA or CTD as the primary intervention. The main outcome was duration of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were immediate- and 1-week success rates and complications.127 patients were included, including 48 patients with SSP. 65 patients underwent NA, 63 patients CTD. Median (interquartile range) hospital stay was significantly shorter for NA: 2.4 days (1.2-4.7 days), compared with CTD: 4.6 days (2.3-7.8 days) (p<0.001). The corresponding figures for the SSP subgroup were 2.54 days (1.17-7.79 days) compared with 5.53 days (3.65-9.21 days) (p=0.049) for NA and CTD, respectively. Immediate success rates were 69% for NA compared with 32% for CTD (p<0.001). The positive effect of NA remained significant in sub-analyses for SSP. There was no significant difference in 1-week success rates. Complications occurred only during the CTD-treatment.Our study shows shorter hospital stay and higher immediate success rates for NA compared with CTD. Subgroup analyses also show clear benefits for NA for both PSP and SSP.

PMID:
28404647
DOI:
10.1183/13993003.01296-2016
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire
Loading ...
Support Center