Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Sep;97(1):11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

Workload even affects hand hygiene in a highly trained and well-staffed setting: a prospective 365/7/24 observational study.

Author information

1
Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Goettingen, University Goettingen, Germany; Infectious Diseases, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: simone.scheithauer@med.uni-goettingen.de.
2
Infectious Diseases, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
3
Clinic for Haematology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Compliance with hand hygiene (HH) has often not proved satisfactory; high workload is a commonly self-reported reason. Previous studies comparing workload and compliance have not measured workload precisely and have focused on certain times of day. This study aimed to investigate the association between HH compliance and workload, both electronically defined 365/7/24 (primary endpoint). In addition, the quality of commonly used compliance defining methods (hand disinfectant usage, direct observation) was investigated (secondary endpoint).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Correlation of electronically measured HH compliance (hand-rub activities (HRA)/HH opportunities) with electronically determined workload (nursing time output/nursing time input) was undertaken over one year at a stem cell transplant unit at University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. HRA and procedures requiring HRA according to the five World Health Organization indications were recorded continuously (365/7/24) using electronic dispensers and electronic documentation, and compliance was calculated accordingly. Hand disinfectant usage was calculated using spending records for one year; direct observation was performed for approximately 1800 HH opportunities.

RESULTS:

During the investigation, 208,184 HRA, translating into 57 [standard deviation (SD) 10] HRA/patient-day (PD), were performed. Electronically determined compliance ranged from 24% to 66% [mean 42.39% (SD 8%)]. The higher the workload, the lower the compliance (R=-0.411; P<0.001). HRA/PD (r=-0.037), hand disinfectant usage (mean 160mL/PD) and observed compliance (95%; 1734 HRA/1813 HH opportunities) were not found to be associated with workload.

CONCLUSION:

Calculated compliance was inversely associated with nurses' workload. HRA/PD, observer-determined compliance and amount of disinfectant dispensed were used as surrogates for compliance, but did not correlate with actual compliance and thus should be used with caution.

KEYWORDS:

Cross-transmission; Hand disinfection; Hospital-acquired infection; Quality management; Surveillance

PMID:
28389091
DOI:
10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.013
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center