Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jun;126(6):1171-1179. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001623.

Effectiveness of Written and Oral Specialty Certification Examinations to Predict Actions against the Medical Licenses of Anesthesiologists.

Author information

1
From the American Board of Anesthesiology, Raleigh, North Carolina (Y.Z., H.S., D.J.C., A.E.H., D.O.W.); Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (D.J.C.); Federation of State Medical Boards, Euless, Texas (A.Y.); and Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (D.O.W.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The American Board of Anesthesiology administers written and oral examinations for its primary certification. This retrospective cohort study tested the hypothesis that the risk of a disciplinary action against a physician's medical license is lower in those who pass both examinations than those who pass only the written examination.

METHODS:

Physicians who entered anesthesiology training from 1971 to 2011 were followed up to 2014. License actions were ascertained via the Disciplinary Action Notification Service of the Federation of State Medical Boards.

RESULTS:

The incidence rate of license actions was relatively stable over the study period, with approximately 2 to 3 new cases per 1,000 person-years. In multivariable models, the risk of license actions was higher in men (hazard ratio = 1.88 [95% CI, 1.66 to 2.13]) and lower in international medical graduates (hazard ratio = 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.81]). Compared with those passing both examinations on the first attempt, those passing neither examination (hazard ratio = 3.60 [95% CI, 3.14 to 4.13]) and those passing only the written examination (hazard ratio = 3.51 [95% CI, 2.87 to 4.29]) had an increased risk of receiving an action from a state medical board. The risk was no different between the latter two groups (P = 0.81), showing that passing the oral but not the written primary certification examination is associated with a decreased risk of subsequent license actions. For those with residency performance information available, having at least one unsatisfactory training record independently increased the risk of license actions.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings support the concept that an oral examination assesses domains important to physician performance that are not fully captured in a written examination.

PMID:
28383325
DOI:
10.1097/ALN.0000000000001623
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center