Send to

Choose Destination
Syst Biol. 2017 Sep 1;66(5):857-879. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syx041.

Why Do Phylogenomic Data Sets Yield Conflicting Trees? Data Type Influences the Avian Tree of Life more than Taxon Sampling.

Author information

Biology Department, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 West Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60660, USA.
Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.
Behavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution-MRC 163, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
Zoology Department, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
4869 Pepperwood Way, San Jose, CA 95124, USA.
Collections Program, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA.
Bowdoin College, Department of Biology and Coastal Studies Center, 6500 College Station, Brunwick, ME 04011, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, 5047 Gullen Mall, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Museum of Natural Science and Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, 119 Foster Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Department of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University 15 of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA.
Sam Noble Museum, University of Oklahoma, 2401 Chautauqua Avenue, Norman, OK 73072, USA.
Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.


Phylogenomics, the use of large-scale data matrices in phylogenetic analyses, has been viewed as the ultimate solution to the problem of resolving difficult nodes in the tree of life. However, it has become clear that analyses of these large genomic data sets can also result in conflicting estimates of phylogeny. Here, we use the early divergences in Neoaves, the largest clade of extant birds, as a "model system" to understand the basis for incongruence among phylogenomic trees. We were motivated by the observation that trees from two recent avian phylogenomic studies exhibit conflicts. Those studies used different strategies: 1) collecting many characters [$\sim$ 42 mega base pairs (Mbp) of sequence data] from 48 birds, sometimes including only one taxon for each major clade; and 2) collecting fewer characters ($\sim$ 0.4 Mbp) from 198 birds, selected to subdivide long branches. However, the studies also used different data types: the taxon-poor data matrix comprised 68% non-coding sequences whereas coding exons dominated the taxon-rich data matrix. This difference raises the question of whether the primary reason for incongruence is the number of sites, the number of taxa, or the data type. To test among these alternative hypotheses we assembled a novel, large-scale data matrix comprising 90% non-coding sequences from 235 bird species. Although increased taxon sampling appeared to have a positive impact on phylogenetic analyses the most important variable was data type. Indeed, by analyzing different subsets of the taxa in our data matrix we found that increased taxon sampling actually resulted in increased congruence with the tree from the previous taxon-poor study (which had a majority of non-coding data) instead of the taxon-rich study (which largely used coding data). We suggest that the observed differences in the estimates of topology for these studies reflect data-type effects due to violations of the models used in phylogenetic analyses, some of which may be difficult to detect. If incongruence among trees estimated using phylogenomic methods largely reflects problems with model fit developing more "biologically-realistic" models is likely to be critical for efforts to reconstruct the tree of life. [Birds; coding exons; GTR model; model fit; Neoaves; non-coding DNA; phylogenomics; taxon sampling.].

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center