Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Oct;46(7):2111-2121. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0975-8. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Masturbation and Partnered Sex: Substitutes or Complements?

Author information

1
Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, 305 E. 23rd St., A1700, CLA 3.306, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. regnerus@prc.utexas.edu.
2
Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
3
Marriott School of Management, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.

Abstract

Drawing upon a large, recent probability sample of American adults ages 18-60 (7648 men and 8090 women), we explored the association between sexual frequency and masturbation, evaluating the evidence for whether masturbation compensates for unavailable sex, complements (or augments) existing paired sexual activity, or bears little association with it. We found evidence supporting a compensatory relationship between masturbation and sexual frequency for men, and a complementary one among women, but each association was both modest and contingent on how content participants were with their self-reported frequency of sex. Among men and women, both partnered status and their sexual contentment were more obvious predictors of masturbation than was recent frequency of sex. We conclude that both hypotheses as commonly evaluated suffer from failing to account for the pivotal role of subjective sexual contentment in predicting masturbation.

KEYWORDS:

Gender differences; Masturbation; Partnered sexual behavior; Sexual desire

PMID:
28341933
DOI:
10.1007/s10508-017-0975-8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center