Sorghum and wheat differentially affect caecal microbiota and associated performance characteristics of meat chickens

PeerJ. 2017 Mar 7:5:e3071. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3071. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

This study compared the effects of wheat- and sorghum-based diets on broiler chickens. The growth performance and caecal microbial community of chickens were measured and correlations between productivity and specific gut microbes were observed. Cobb broilers 15 days of age were individually caged and two dietary treatments were used, one with a wheat-based diet (n = 48) and another one with a sorghum-based diet (n = 48). Growth performance measurements were taken over a 10 day period and samples for microbiota analysis were taken at the end of that period. Caecal microbiota was characterised by sequencing of 16S bacterial rRNA gene amplicons. Overall, the results indicated that a sorghum-based diet produced higher apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and body-weight gain (BWG) values in chickens, compared to a wheat-based diet. Nevertheless, sorghum-fed birds had higher feed conversion ratio (FCR) values than wheat-fed birds, possibly because of some anti-nutritional factors in sorghum. Further analyses showed that caecal microbial community was significantly associated with AME values, but microbiota composition differed between dietary treatments. A number of bacteria were individually correlated with growth performance measurements. Numerous OTUs assigned to strains of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lachnospiraceae, which were prevalent in sorghum-fed chickens, were correlated with high AME and BWG values, respectively. Additionally, a number of OTUs assigned to Clostridiales that were prevalent in wheat-fed chickens were correlated with low FCR values. Overall, these results suggest that between-diet variations in growth performance were partly associated with changes in the caecal microbiota.

Keywords: Caecum; Chicken; Diet; Digestive efficiency; Energy assimilation; Feed conversion; Gastrointestinal tract; Microbiota; Sorghum; Wheat.

Grants and funding

This research was conducted within the Poultry CRC, established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program under project CRC 2.1.5. DS is ARC DECRA Fellow. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.