Send to

Choose Destination
Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Mar;68:18-34.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Feb 4.

Optimizing the Diagnosis and Management of Dravet Syndrome: Recommendations From a North American Consensus Panel.

Author information

Child and Adolescent Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address:
Epilepsy Center, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Dravet Syndrome Foundation.
Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida.
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Intractable Childhood Epilepsy Alliance.



To establish standards for early, cost-effective, and accurate diagnosis; optimal therapies for seizures; and recommendations for evaluation and management of comorbidities for children and adults with Dravet syndrome, using a modified Delphi process.


An expert panel was convened comprising epileptologists with nationally recognized expertise in Dravet syndrome and parents of children with Dravet syndrome, whose experience and understanding was enhanced by their active roles in Dravet syndrome associations. Panelists were asked to base their responses to questions both on their clinical expertise and results of a literature review that was forwarded to each panelist. Three rounds of online questionnaires were conducted to identify areas of consensus and strength of that consensus, as well as areas of contention.


The panel consisted of 13 physicians and five family members. Strong consensus was reached regarding typical clinical presentation of Dravet syndrome, range of electroencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging findings, need for genetic testing, critical information that should be conveyed to families at diagnosis, priorities for seizure control and typical degree of control, seizure triggers and recommendations for avoidance, first- and second-line therapies for seizures, requirement and indications for rescue therapy, specific recommendations for comorbidity screening, and need for family support. Consensus was not as strong regarding later therapies, including vagus nerve stimulation and callosotomy, and for specific therapies of associated comorbidities. Beyond the initial treatment with benzodiazepines and use of valproate, there was no consensus on the optimal in-hospital management of convulsive status epilepticus.


We were able to identify areas where there was strong consensus that we hope will (1) inform health care providers on optimal diagnosis and management of patients with Dravet syndrome, (2) support reimbursement from insurance companies for genetic testing and Dravet syndrome-specific therapies, and (3) improve quality of life for patients with Dravet syndrome and their families by avoidance of unnecessary testing and provision of an early accurate diagnosis allowing optimal selection of therapeutic strategies.


Dravet syndrome; diagnosis; genetic testing; guidelines; questionnaire

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center