Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 7;69(9):1129-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.081.

Relationship Between Physical Activity, Body Mass Index, and Risk of Heart Failure.

Author information

1
Division of Cardiology, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
2
Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
3
Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
4
Division of Cardiology, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Clinical Sciences, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
5
Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
6
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island and Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
7
Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
8
Division of Cardiology, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Clinical Sciences, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: jarett.berry@utsouthwestern.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Lower leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and higher body mass index (BMI) are independently associated with risk of heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear if this relationship is consistent for both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to quantify dose-response associations between LTPA, BMI, and the risk of different HF subtypes.

METHODS:

Individual-level data from 3 cohort studies (WHI [Women's Health Initiative], MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis], and CHS [Cardiovascular Health Study]) were pooled and participants were stratified into guideline-recommended categories of LTPA and BMI. Associations between LTPA, BMI, and risk of overall HF, HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥45%), and HFrEF (ejection fraction <45%) were assessed by using multivariable adjusted Cox models and restricted cubic splines.

RESULTS:

The study included 51,451 participants with 3,180 HF events (1,252 HFpEF, 914 HFrEF, and 1,014 unclassified HF). In the adjusted analysis, there was a dose-dependent association between higher LTPA levels, lower BMI, and overall HF risk. Among HF subtypes, LTPA in any dose range was not associated with HFrEF risk. In contrast, lower levels of LTPA (<500 MET-min/week) were not associated with HFpEF risk, and dose-dependent associations with lower HFpEF risk were observed at higher levels. Compared with no LTPA, higher than twice the guideline-recommended minimum LTPA levels (>1,000 MET-min/week) were associated with an 19% lower risk of HFpEF (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.97). The dose-response relationship for BMI with HFpEF risk was also more consistent than with HFrEF risk, such that increasing BMI above the normal range (≥25 kg/m2) was associated with a greater increase in risk of HFpEF than HFrEF.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study findings show strong, dose-dependent associations between LTPA levels, BMI, and risk of overall HF. Among HF subtypes, higher LTPA levels and lower BMI were more consistently associated with lower risk of HFpEF compared with HFrEF.

KEYWORDS:

body mass index; dose–response relationship; heart failure; physical activity

PMID:
28254175
PMCID:
PMC5848099
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.081
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

MeSH terms, Grant support

MeSH terms

Grant support

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center