Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Vis. 2017 Feb 1;17(2):12. doi: 10.1167/17.2.12.

Different spatial representations guide eye and hand movements.

Author information

1
Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, FranceCNRS (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, UMR 8242), Paris, Francematteo_lisi@yahoo.it.
2
Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, FranceCNRS (Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, UMR 8242), Paris, FranceDartmouth College, Psychological and Brain Sciences, Hanover, NH, USApatrick.cavanagh@dartmouth.edu.

Abstract

Our visual system allows us to localize objects in the world and plan motor actions toward them. We have recently shown that the localization of moving objects differs between perception and saccadic eye movements (Lisi & Cavanagh, 2015), suggesting different localization mechanisms for perception and action. This finding, however, could reflect a unique feature of the saccade system rather than a general dissociation between perception and action. To disentangle these hypotheses, we compared object localization between saccades and hand movements. We flashed brief targets on top of double-drift stimuli (moving Gabors with the internal pattern drifting orthogonally to their displacement, inducing large distortions in perceived location and direction) and asked participants to point or make saccades to them. We found a surprising difference between the two types of movements: Although saccades targeted the physical location of the flashes, pointing movements were strongly biased toward the perceived location (about 63% of the perceptual illusion). The same bias was found when pointing movements were made in open-loop conditions (without vision of the hand). These results indicate that dissociations are present between different types of actions (not only between action and perception) and that visual processing for saccadic eye movements differs from that for other actions. Because the position bias in the double-drift stimulus depends on a persisting influence of past sensory signals, we suggest that spatial maps for saccades might reflect only recent, short-lived signals, and the spatial representations supporting conscious perception and hand movements integrate visual input over longer temporal intervals.

PMID:
28245493
DOI:
10.1167/17.2.12
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center