Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):622-632. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.4. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

Do Primary Care Provider Strategies Improve Patient Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening?

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
2
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
3
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
4
Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
5
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
6
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
7
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Screening rates for colorectal cancer (CRC) remain suboptimal. The impact of provider strategies to enhance screening participation in the population is uncertain. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of provider strategies to increase screening in a single-payer system.

METHODS:

A population-based survey was conducted in primary care providers (PCPs) linked to patients using administrative data in Ontario, Canada. Patients were due for CRC screening from April 2012 to March 2013. Patients were followed up until 31 March 2014. We determined time to become up-to-date with CRC screening. Cox proportional hazards models examined the association between PCP strategies and uptake of screening, adjusted for physician and patient factors.

RESULTS:

A total of 717 PCPs and their 147,834 rostered patients due for CRC screening were included. Most physicians employed strategies to enhance screening participation, including electronic medical record use, reminders, generation of lists, audit and feedback reports, or designating staff responsible for screening. No single strategy was strongly associated with screening. For those >1 year overdue, a systematic approach to generate lists of patients overdue for screening was weakly associated with screening uptake (hazard ratio (HR)=1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26, P=0.04 >5 years overdue vs. <1 year overdue). The use of multiple PCP strategies was associated with screening participation (HR=1.27, 95% CI: 1.16-1.39, P<0.0001 for PCPs using 4-5 vs. 0-1 strategies). Practice-based strategies were self-reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

In practice, while individual PCP strategies have little effect, the use of multiple strategies to enhance screening appears to improve CRC screening uptake in patients.

PMID:
28244494
DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2017.4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center