Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Syst Biol. 2017 Feb 28;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12918-017-0409-1.

Predicting network modules of cell cycle regulators using relative protein abundance statistics.

Author information

1
Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, 24061, USA. cihanoguzvt@gmail.com.
2
Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, 24061, USA.
3
Department of Mathematics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, 24061, USA.
4
Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, 24061, USA.
5
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, 24061, USA.
6
Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, 24061, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Parameter estimation in systems biology is typically done by enforcing experimental observations through an objective function as the parameter space of a model is explored by numerical simulations. Past studies have shown that one usually finds a set of "feasible" parameter vectors that fit the available experimental data equally well, and that these alternative vectors can make different predictions under novel experimental conditions. In this study, we characterize the feasible region of a complex model of the budding yeast cell cycle under a large set of discrete experimental constraints in order to test whether the statistical features of relative protein abundance predictions are influenced by the topology of the cell cycle regulatory network.

RESULTS:

Using differential evolution, we generate an ensemble of feasible parameter vectors that reproduce the phenotypes (viable or inviable) of wild-type yeast cells and 110 mutant strains. We use this ensemble to predict the phenotypes of 129 mutant strains for which experimental data is not available. We identify 86 novel mutants that are predicted to be viable and then rank the cell cycle proteins in terms of their contributions to cumulative variability of relative protein abundance predictions. Proteins involved in "regulation of cell size" and "regulation of G1/S transition" contribute most to predictive variability, whereas proteins involved in "positive regulation of transcription involved in exit from mitosis," "mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint" and "negative regulation of cyclin-dependent protein kinase by cyclin degradation" contribute the least. These results suggest that the statistics of these predictions may be generating patterns specific to individual network modules (START, S/G2/M, and EXIT). To test this hypothesis, we develop random forest models for predicting the network modules of cell cycle regulators using relative abundance statistics as model inputs. Predictive performance is assessed by the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). Our models generate an AUC range of 0.83-0.87 as opposed to randomized models with AUC values around 0.50.

CONCLUSIONS:

By using differential evolution and random forest modeling, we show that the model prediction statistics generate distinct network module-specific patterns within the cell cycle network.

KEYWORDS:

Budding yeast; Cell cycle; Differential evolution; Ensemble modeling; Machine learning; Parameter optimization; Random forests; Systems biology

PMID:
28241833
PMCID:
PMC5329933
DOI:
10.1186/s12918-017-0409-1
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center