Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 May;39:176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

Early experience with lateral lumbar total disc replacement: Utility, complications and revision strategies.

Author information

1
Neuroscience Institute, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3121, Australia. Electronic address: gmalham@bigpond.net.au.
2
Greg Malham Neurosurgeon, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.

Abstract

Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is an alternative to interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Traditionally, lumbar TDR is performed via an anterior retroperitoneal approach with regional risks of vascular and visceral injury. The direct lateral retroperitoneal, transpsoas approach avoids mobilisation of the great vessels and preserves the anterior longitudinal ligament, thereby maintaining physiological limits on motion. This study aimed to (i) report one site's early experience with lateral lumbar TDR and (ii) provide case examples illustrating the utility, complications and revision strategies of the XL-TDR device. Data were collected prospectively on the first 12 consecutive patients treated with XL-TDR. Patient outcomes included pain (VAS), disability (ODI), and quality of life (SF-36 PCS and MCS). Mean follow-up was 27.5months (range 18-48months). Patients had significant improvements in back (74%) and leg (50%) pain, ODI (69%), PCS (50%) and MCS (39%) (P<0.05). Two patients had early prosthesis dislocation due to prosthesis undersizing. The same skin incision was used to retrieve the XL-TDR and perform salvage lateral lumber interbody fusion, with solid fusion by 12months. Lumbar TDR using the XL-TDR via a lateral transpsoas muscle-splitting approach is a minimally invasive alternative to anterior retroperitoneal exposures for motion preservation. Correct sizing of the XL-TDR and complete contralateral annulectomy with annulus box cutters mitigates the risk of lateral dislocation. Revision surgery for lateral dislocation of the XL-TDR is more straightforward compared to anterior TDR dislocation.

KEYWORDS:

Clinical outcomes; Complications; Lateral; Lumbar; Revision; Total disc replacement

PMID:
28215460
DOI:
10.1016/j.jocn.2017.01.033
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center