Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Cell Commun Signal. 2017 Jun;11(2):181-185. doi: 10.1007/s12079-016-0370-6. Epub 2017 Feb 18.

Questionable papers in citation databases as an issue for literature review.

Author information

1
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. Mehdidadkhah@mail.um.ac.ir.
2
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
3
Progressive Science Institute, Box 5335, Berkeley, CA, 94705, USA.

Abstract

In recent years, the academic world has been faced with much academic misconduct. Examples involve plagiarizing papers, manipulating data, and launching predatory or hijacked journals. The literature exposing these activities is growing exponentially, and so is the presentation of criteria or guidelines for counteracting the problem. Most of the research is focused on predatory or hijacked journal detection and providing suitable warnings. Overlooked in all this is the fact that papers published in these journals are questionable, but nevertheless show up in standard citation databases. We need some way to flag them so future researchers will be aware of their questionable nature and prevent their use in literature review.

KEYWORDS:

Academic ethics; Citation databases; Hijacked journals; Literature review; Predatory journals; Questionable papers

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center