Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Public Health Policy. 2016 Dec;37(4):403-410. doi: 10.1057/s41271-016-0031-2.

Harm reduction and e-cigarettes: Distorting the approach.

Author information

1
WFPHA, 20 Napier Close, Deakin, ACT, 2612, Australia. mmoore@phaa.net.au.
2
London School Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
3
Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Abstract

Some supporters of electronic cigarettes have argued that they should be considered a form of harm reduction, analogous to that which has been successful with narcotics. In this viewpoint, we contend that this argument is based on highly selective use of the evidence, coupled with a fundamental misunderstanding of a comprehensive harm minimisation strategy. This includes not only harm reduction but also reduction in demand and supply-two elements that are explicitly rejected by many advocates of electronic cigarettes. We contend that, in the absence of all three elements, there is a danger that electronic cigarettes will delay the achievement of a tobacco-free world.

KEYWORDS:

electronic cigarettes; harm reduction; smoking; tobacco control; tobacco endgame

PMID:
28202930
DOI:
10.1057/s41271-016-0031-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center