Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4059-4.

The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses.

Author information

1
Department of work psychology and physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway. Stein.Knardahl@stami.no.
2
Department of Occupational Health Surveillance, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
3
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
4
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
5
Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
6
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Previous studies indicate that psychological, social, and organizational factors at work contribute to health, motivation, absence from work, and functional ability. The objective of the study was to assess the current state of knowledge of the contribution of psychological, social, and organizational factors to disability retirement by a systematic review and meta-analyses.

METHODS:

Data sources: A systematic literature search for studies of retirement due to disability in Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO was performed. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional studies.

DATA EXTRACTION:

Internal validity was assessed independently by two referees with a detailed checklist for sources of bias. Conclusions were drawn based on studies with acceptable quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

We calculated combined effect estimates by means of averaged associations (Risk ratios) across samples, weighting observed associations by the study's sample size. Thirty-nine studies of accepted quality were found, 37 of which from the Nordic countries.

RESULTS:

There was moderate evidence for the role of low control (supported by weighted average RR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.21-1.61) and moderate evidence for the combination of high demands and low control (although weighted average was RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.96-2.19) as predictors of disability retirement. There were no major systematic differences in findings between the highest rated and the lowest rated studies that passed the criterion for adequate quality. There was limited evidence for downsizing, organizational change, lack of employee development and supplementary training, repetitive work tasks, effort-reward imbalance to increase risk of disability pension. Very limited evidence was found for job demands, evening or night work, and low social support from ones superior.

CONCLUSIONS:

Psychological and organizational factors at work contribute to disability retirement with the most robust evidence for the role of work control. We recommend the measurement of specific exposure factors in future studies.

KEYWORDS:

Disability pension; Disability retirement; Organizational; Psychological; Psychosocial; Shift; Social; Systematic review; Work

PMID:
28178966
PMCID:
PMC5299735
DOI:
10.1186/s12889-017-4059-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center