Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 May;43:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Differential access to syringe exchange and other prevention activities among people who inject drugs in rural and urban areas of Puerto Rico.

Author information

1
206 Benton Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, United States. Electronic address: Mwelch2@unl.edu.
2
216 Benton Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, United States.
3
206 Benton Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, United States.
4
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 63 Calle Jose de Diego, Cidra, PR 00739, United States.
5
Puerto Rico Department of Health, P.O. Box 70184, San Juan, PR 00936-8184, United States.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Injection drug use and its associated blood-borne infections has become a rapidly increasing problem in rural areas of the US recently. Syringe exchange programs have been shown to be effective for reducing transmission of blood borne infections, however access to these prevention efforts may be limited in rural areas.

METHODS:

This paper utilizes two separate community samples of people who inject drugs (PWID) in Puerto Rico to achieve the following research objectives: (1) compare rural and urban access to syringe exchange programs, free sterile syringes and other HIV/HCV prevention activities, and (2) examine whether utilization of prevention activities is associated with lower injection risk behaviors. Two samples were recruited with RDS (n=315 rural sample; n=512 urban sample) and included adults aged 18 years and older who have injected drugs within the past month.

RESULTS:

78.5% of the urban sample utilized a syringe exchange program in the past year, compared to 58.4% of the rural sample (p<.001). 71.4% of the urban sample received free sterile needles, compared to 58.4% of the rural sample (p<.001). 66% of the urban sample received free works compared to 59% of the rural sample (p=.034). 29% of urban PWID had a conversation with an outreach worker about HIV prevention compared to 18% of the rural sample (p<0.001). Receiving free needles significantly increases the frequency of using a sterile needle to inject (p<.001).

CONCLUSION:

Urban PWID were significantly more likely to have utilized syringe exchange programs, received free sterile needles, received free works, and to have talked about HIV prevention with an outreach worker during the past year than PWID residing in rural areas. Individuals who accessed these prevention activities were significantly less likely to exhibit risky injection behavior. Policy implications call for increasing access to prevention services in rural areas to reduce disease transmission.

KEYWORDS:

HIV; Hepatitis C; Injection drug use; Syringe exchange programs

PMID:
28160735
PMCID:
PMC5420501
DOI:
10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.011
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center